Oregon lawmakers, grassroots organizations push for evidence-based, financially responsible climate bill to protect state's investments and retirees

February 8, 2023

Oregon lawmakers, grassroots organizations push for evidence-based, financially responsible climate bill to protect state's investments and retirees.


Salem, OR -- The 2023 Oregon Treasury Investment and Climate Act (HB 2601) addresses the major financial risks posed by climate change and fossil fuel investments, while promoting accountability in the management of Oregon’s investments, said Divest Oregon. State Treasurer Tobias Read has defended the state’s fossil fuel holdings, despite the risks flagged by the Oregon State Treasury’s own consultants and the Treasurer’s release of a long-term decarbonization timeline. The first public hearing for HB 2601 will be held on Thursday, February 16, 2023 in Salem. 


State Representatives Pham (HD36), Dexter (HD33), and Gamba (HD41) and State Senator Golden (SD3) are sponsoring HB 2601, which will put a moratorium on new carbon-intensive investments made by the Oregon State Treasury and establish a timeline for the Treasury to drop its carbon-intensive holdings. As part of this decarbonization process, HB 2601 also requires the Treasury to disclose its holdings and show its progress to lawmakers and the public. The Treasury manages $137 billion, with most of this in the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). 


“This bill is about preparing Oregonians for a financial future shaped by the ongoing transition to clean energy,” said Chris Abbruzzese, an Oregon-based investor and former financial risk manager. “Fossil fuels are currently being phased out globally, yet the Oregon State Treasury continues to invest in these assets, oftentimes through contracts that extend beyond 10 years. By the time climate change becomes a defining issue for financial valuation, it may be too late to eliminate these investments from the PERS portfolio. PERS fiduciaries, like the Treasurer and members of the Oregon Investment Council, serve for four-year terms, a time horizon that is too short given the longer-term issues at hand. As such, we need legislators to act now to limit these actors’ ability to be seduced by short-term returns at the expense of beneficiaries’ longer-term best interests. This bill acknowledges this fiduciary disconnect and protects retirees’ long-term interests as required by Oregon law with an appropriate level of urgency.”


The Oregon State Treasury, which is responsible for the
pensions of 393,080 Oregonians, has at least $5.3 billion invested in fossil fuel companies. The Treasury is notable for its large interest in private investment funds by contracted managers, including over a quarter in Treasury's private equity class alone. How those outside managers invest this money is kept from public disclosure by state law. Many private equity funds are heavily invested in fossil fuels. As the world transitions to new energy sources, investors left holding stock in fossil fuel companies -- or locked into 10-12 year contracts with private equity firms -- face the likelihood of these investments becoming riskier, or even worthless, over time.

“Unfortunately, risk to the PERS portfolio because of climate change is not theoretical,”
said Susan Palmiter, volunteer Co-lead of Divest Oregon. “We saw how holding on to risky investments for too long results in losses. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Oregon State Treasury was left with worthless stock in Russian companies.”


A
February 2022 report prepared by Ortec Finance, contracted by the Oregon State Treasury, demonstrates the "significant negative impacts" of retaining fossil-fuel holdings. The report, which was released to Divest Oregon after the Treasurer wrote to the Oregon legislature in January 2023, shows that the baseline loss over the next 5 years for not divesting from PERS fossil fuel holdings would be 14.5% in a "disorderly [energy] transition" (the current state of affairs). 


The report also points out that switching out all of the Treasury's public equity holdings in fossil fuel companies would be a positive move in the next 5 years. This corroborates the findings of Divest Oregon’s “Risky Business” report (April 2022) that determined PERS underperformed by $4-10 billion in the past decade due to the drag by fossil fuel investments. In the past decade, this is a loss of up to $6,000 for each PERS retiree per year.


“The Treasurer is treating this time of upheaval as business as usual. He is resisting HB 2601 despite the mounting evidence of long-term decline in the value of fossil fuel investments, his public support for decarbonization of the Treasury investments, the losses that PERS retirees have experienced over the past decade, and the recommendations of his own consultants,” said Jenifer Schramm, volunteer Co-lead of Divest Oregon. “In fact, the Treasury has even made new long-term fossil fuel investments to the tune of half a billion dollars in the month since the bill became public. Rather than obstructing this effort, the Treasury could use this bill to show his support for evidenced-based, financially responsible investing.” 


Oregon’s PERS performance lags behind peers, both in terms of real returns and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. Of the top 15 largest US public pension funds, the 5- and 10-year returns for PERS are near the bottom of the pack. 

Of these large pension funds, PERS has the highest exposure to private equity investments, which are opaque and difficult to exit quickly. According to the Pew Research Center these types of “risky, high-fee assets … must be scrutinized for transparent reporting.”


“This bill is as much about accountability and transparency, as it is about financial responsibility and climate-smart investing,” said Andrew Bogrand, volunteer Communications Director of Divest Oregon. “Not only does Oregon’s legislature need to mandate an end to new fossil fuel investments and a phased approach to decarbonization, but it must play an oversight role. Discrepancies and public records delays suggest a lack of transparency, as do risky and questionable holdings. HB 2601 will better ensure accountability and help align our state’s investments with our state’s values.”


The Oregon State Treasury has come under national scrutiny for investing in the NSO Group
, a spyware company which was blacklisted by the US government after revelations emerged that its signature product was used to spy on dissidents, activists, and diplomats. According to the United Nations, the Treasury also ranks 46th out of 47th for ESG investing among large public pensions. Poor ESG ratings are linked to poor financial performance. According to McKinsey,  “paying attention to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns does not compromise returns — rather, the opposite.”


“A close look at coal, oil and gas portfolio performance provides overwhelming financial evidence that the industry has declined precipitously and that the outlook for oil and gas companies is negative,” said Tom Sanzillo, past Deputy Comptroller of New York State, and Director of Financial Analysis at IEEFA. “In the past 12 years, the MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI) without fossil fuels outperformed the MSCI ACWI with fossil fuels. The gap exists even after accounting for the substantial oil price increases that occurred after the invasion of Ukraine.”


To date, over 1,550 institutions  representing over $40 trillion in assets have already committed to fossil fuel divestment. HB 2601 is supported by dozens of grassroots organizations across the state, including unions with PERS members, racial and climate justice groups, youth-led movements, and faith communities. 


–ENDS–


Notes to editors:

February 7, 2025
In December 2024, the Oregon Treasury published their Oregon Net Zero Plan 2024 Annual Report . Kudos to Treasurer Read for creating a Net Zero Plan and publishing the 2024 annual report before leaving office. Treasurer Read’s strong statement that climate risk is financial risk is essential context for the report. Divest Oregon published this analysis of the 2024 annual report including the following sections: Transition Readiness Framework/Carbon Intensive Review Manager Activity/Private Investments ESG Integration/Forming Alliances and Engagement Investing in climate-focused funds Proxy Voting Stewardship and Universal Ownership Divest Oregon strongly recommends the following: The Treasury's report should be sent to all PERS beneficiaries and prominently displayed on the Treasury website. Stakeholder input should be solicited during the formulation of Treasury action in this sphere and before the publication of the next plan report.
Oregon waterfall
January 14, 2025
“First-in-the-nation” Pause Act will protect Oregon retirees from private equity’s overexposure to fossil fuels
January 14, 2025
Few public pension fund trustees have adopted a plan to address the risk of climate change to their portfolio. Oregon should be applauded as one of them, yet how does Oregon’s proposed plan compare to the major net zero plans of other US public pension plans? Divest Oregon has just released a comprehensive and detailed Comparison of US Pension Funds' Net Zero Plans Report . It allows the Oregon Treasurer and the Oregon Investment Council (OIC) to see what other fiduciaries are planning, to adopt best practices, and to change OIC policy as needed. Climate change is moving fast, and the report should be used by Oregon PERS and all fiduciaries to move faster in implementing a strong plan.
November 13, 2024
The newly released 2024 Private Equity Climate Risks Scorecard & Report by our allies, Private Equity Stakeholder Project, Global Energy Monitor, and Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund, gives us new insight into private equity firms and OST investments in these secret funds. Twenty-one major private equity firms manage $6 trillion in assets – and two-thirds of the energy companies in their portfolios are invested in fossil fuels. Oregon state employees’ pension plan (PERS) invests in 11 of these 21 funds.
September 26, 2024
Above: Natural coastal area of the proposed Rio Grande LNG terminal. Credit: Dylan Baddour/ Inside Climate News Below: Artist Rendering of the Rio Grande LNG project (Photo: Business Wire , 11/21/2019)
August 19, 2024
A recent article in Chief Investment Officer reported that the University of California had solid returns mostly stemming from a fund that excludes tobacco and fossil fuel investments: The University of California’s endowment and pension fund each returned more than 12% for the fiscal year ending June 30, boosting the total asset value of the university’s investment portfolio by $16 billion to $180 billion. Some $1.3 billion of that $16 billion gain came from a single S&P 500 index fund—one which excludes tobacco and fossil fuel investments—that provided the portfolio with its single biggest investment gain. We assume the OIC and Treasury would be thrilled by these types of returns, given the drag that private investments are causing to the portfolio returns, and the continuing liquidity problems of private funds. UC invests where they have a strong conviction while fulfilling their fiduciary duty. The two are not mutually exclusive: “This past fiscal year was about investing only in what we fully understand and taking full advantage of low-fee index funds guided by what we call the UC Investments Way,” said UC CIO Jagdeep Singh Bachher in a statement. “It’s about simplicity and leveraging our scale to concentrate on areas where we have strong conviction.” Bachher added that he believes the U.S. and “its resilient economy and thriving innovation ecosystem … is the best place to invest,” and the UC system has backed that up by allocating approximately 75% of its portfolio to domestic investments. We look forward to seeing the OST swiftly shift a significant portion of OPERF to index funds that exclude fossil fuels and to end any consideration of new investments in private funds that are laden with fossil fuel assets, as described in the Treasurer’s Net-Zero Plan. Collectively the country has moved past climate denial. The Oregon Treasury and the Oregon Investment Council should not get mired in solution denial . The solutions for a healthier pension and planet are available now!
August 6, 2024
A recent Bloomberg article explains that Oregon PERS made critical energy flow to the Putin regime possible, by enabling an LNG terminal. How? A $500 million financial commitment made in 2020 with $209.3 million is still available for investment, even after Treasurer Read said he would “Stand with Ukraine” and OIC agreed to end all Russian investments. This long-term, locked-in commitment of funds is one of reasons Divest Oregon continues to question private investments – especially since they are often laden with risky fossil fuel companies. Private investments comprise over half of the PERS portfolio . Background: The Oregon Treasury committed $500 million to the Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund IV in 2020 . In fact, the Treasury has been investing in Stonepeak Infrastructure Funds since 2012 . The commitment to a private fund is a long-term one. Once that commitment is made, the Treasury can only exit that fund at a steep loss, and once the commitment is made, the Treasury had no say in specific investments by the fund managers. Bloomberg reported that pension funds, including Oregon, enable the largest Russian LNG export terminal to function. Stonepeak invested in Seapeak LLC, which provides ice-class carriers specifically designed to carry Russian LNG from the Arctic. The carriers are only used for this purpose and are essential to the gas terminal. The investment by pension funds enables critical revenue flow to the Putin regime. The Bloomberg article states: The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, known as CalPERS, is one of the investors in Stonepeak’s fund and it said in response to a Bloomberg query that it had already raised concerns with the general partner. ‘We believe that Russian investments pose a material risk to our long-term investment success and have taken actions, consistent with our fiduciary duty, to remove these assets from our portfolio,’ John Myers, chief of Calpers’ office of public affairs, said in a statement. ‘We will continue monitoring events to ensure our partners’ actions are consistent with our investment beliefs.’ The Washington State Investment Board, Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund, New York State Common Retirement Fund and the Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois declined to comment. Divest Oregon asked the Oregon Investment Council in one of our many emails to them: Is this a responsible investment, or a material risk? There were no sanctions violated, but does this uphold the pledge to “Stand with Ukraine” made by Treasurer Read and backed by the Council? We also asked: Do the long term risks justify continued new investments in predominantly fossil fuel private funds? We request that the OIC insure that there are NO NEW investments in fossil fuel investments especially in the private investment or bonds/credit markets. Digging the hole deeper makes no sense when you are already over target allocations in these private investments. Image: A Russian ice-breaking LNG Carrier. Source: VCG/Visual China Group/Getty Images
July 1, 2024
At the June 15th national-level meeting of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), delegates overwhelmingly approved a sweeping resolution demanding that state pension boards and other fund managers divest fossil fuels from their funds. AAUP Oregon, the state-level organization of the AAUP, is a member of the Divest Oregon coalition and a leading union voice for divestment in our state. Victor Reyes, AAUP Oregon’s executive director, responded: “Watching the resolution pass with such overwhelming support by AAUP members from across the United States filled me with pride and reinforced the importance of the work we are continuing to do in our state as members of the Divest Oregon coalition. Our members understand that there is no retirement in a destroyed environment, and I feel confident that public support for divesting from fossil fuels can only grow with these recent wins.” Now the resolution goes to the AAUP executive committee for ratification and to direct its implementation.
June 18, 2024
These articles were shared with the members of the Oregon Investment Council in June 2024. When considering the speed of the transition , here are some important data points: Electric Cars are Suddenly Becoming Affordable ( NYTimes Business Section, 6/3/2024) “The E.V. market has hit an inflection point,” said Randy Parker, chief executive of Hyundai Motor America, which will begin producing electric vehicles at a factory in Georgia by the end of the year. “The early adopters have come. They’ve got their cars. Now you’re starting to see us transition to a mass market.” IEA expects global clean energy investment to hit $2 trillion in 2024 ( Reuters , 6/5/2024) The Cleantech Revolution ( Rocky Mountain Institute , 6/2024) The world has moved on to the steep part of the S curve (as shown below), which will sweep us from minimal reliance on renewable energy to minimal dependence on fossil fuel. Last year or this year, we will hit peak fossil fuel demand — the advent of cheap solar and wind and batteries, combined with rapidly developing technologies like heat pumps and EVs, has finally caught up with the surging human demand for energy even as more Asian economies enter periods of rapid growth. (comments by Bill McKibben)
June 3, 2024
Four days before the start of his New York felony trial, presidential nominee Donald Trump engaged in some major self-soothing activity — shaking down Big Oil for $1 billion in order to help him trash the climate. According to the Washington Post, which broke the story, Trump invited two dozen oil executives to a dinner at Mar-a-Lago. After one executive complained about burdensome environmental regulations issued by the Biden administration, Trump responded with a stunner, telling his guests: You are wealthy enough to raise $1 billion to return me to the White House. That would be a “deal,” he said, because of the costs of taxes and regulation they would avoid thanks to him. He vowed to immediately reverse dozens of environmental rules and policies and stop new ones. Trump said he would: End the freeze on new LNG exports - “you’ll get it the first day”; Auction more Gulf of Mexico oil leases; Allow more drilling in the Alaskan Arctic-“You’ve been waiting on a permit for five years; you’ll get it on Day 1”; Continue to “hate wind” [explaining why he breaks it?]. (According to the New York Times, Trump claims that windmills cause cancer and are driving whales insane). Scrap electric vehicle mandates (although they do not exist). Presumably this means scrapping regulations to reduce auto tailpipe emissions. Trump has earlier promised to end California’s ability to require cleaner cars than federal regulations do. One person involved in the industry said many oil executives wanted Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis or another Republican to challenge Biden. But now that Trump is the nominee, this person said, they are going to embrace his policies and give. Alex Witt, a senior adviser for oil and gas with Climate Power, said Trump’s promise is he will do whatever the oil industry wants if they support him. With Trump, Witt said, “everything has a price.” “They got a great return on their investment during Trump’s first term, and Trump is making it crystal clear that they’re in for an even bigger payout if he’s reelected,” she said.
More Posts
Share by: